Menu
Prefer to listen instead? Here’s the podcast version of this article.
For centuries, historians have pored over chipped marble, weathered bronze, and crumbling manuscripts, trying to make sense of the incomplete whispers left by the Roman world. The Latin inscriptions that survive are often riddled with gaps—missing words, dates, or even entire passages—leaving experts to rely on painstaking guesswork. But now, artificial intelligence is stepping into the role of scholarly sidekick. With advanced machine learning models trained on thousands of ancient texts, AI is not only helping to reconstruct lost fragments but also pinpointing when and where an inscription may have been carved. This isn’t just a technological leap—it’s a chance to breathe new life into voices silenced for nearly two millennia.
DeepMind’s model, Aeneas, trained on over 176,000 Latin inscriptions spanning 1,500 years—from Portugal to Afghanistan—can predict missing text, estimate geographic origin, and even approximate date ranges. It substitutes a laborious manual hunt through archives with instant suggestions based on contextual parallels and historians found it helpful in 90% of tests.
In one striking case—the Res Gestae Divi Augusti—Aeneas offered two plausible date ranges that align perfectly with existing scholarly debate, showcasing its capacity to handle historical uncertainty quantitatively [Wall Street Journal].
Think of Aeneas as an erudite assistant: it speeds up deciphering, proposes parallels across thousands of inscriptions, and strengthens interpretive context in seconds—a workflow that would otherwise take years [Smithsonian Magazine].
Historians praise its precision, particularly where inscriptions follow formulaic patterns. Yet, they also caution: truly unique artifacts may still require human expertise to avoid misinterpretations.
Aeneas isn’t the only AI in this arena. The “In Codice Ratio” project, for example, used AI-driven OCR to decode Vatican handwritten Latin documents with 96% accuracy. Meanwhile, Latin BERT—a contextual language model—can predict missing Latin words and improve linguistic tagging. And specialized tools like a tailored Handwritten Text Recognition (HTR) system are delivering character error rates as low as 0.015 for medieval Latin dictionaries.
The marriage of AI and historical research isn’t about replacing scholars—it’s about equipping them with tools that would have been unimaginable even a decade ago. By reconstructing lost Latin inscriptions, AI models like DeepMind’s Aeneas are not only accelerating the pace of discovery but also enhancing accuracy in ways that manual research alone could never achieve.
Every restored phrase, every rediscovered date, and every clarified meaning brings us closer to understanding the thoughts, laws, and stories of ancient civilizations. Yet, the true magic happens when human expertise and machine intelligence work side by side—melding the intuition of the historian with the computational power of AI.
WEBINAR
